Magnetic Resonance Treatments - Are they better?
In the area of Electromagnetic treatments often discussed this technology, PEMF (Pulsed Electric Magnetic Frequencies).Some manufacturers explain that their technology is aligned to the MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging).
The Manufacturer describes its device and solution in these ways:
Magnesphere
The Magnesphere uses the basic physics principle of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance by which a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) device applies an external magnetic field to alter molecular or atomic targets in the body to achieve its results. The MRI device alters the molecules in the body with a very powerful magnet, in such a dramatic manner as to be able to obtain an image. In contrast, the Magnesphere™ device utilizes the same principle, albeit at targeted field strengths of a much lower (physiologic) level. Check the link.
Source: https://magneceutical.com
Thereson - TMR ( Therapy Magnetic Resonance )
TMR® Therapeutic Magnetic Resonance is based on pulsed electromagnetic fields at frequencies that are optimized and variable during stimulation. Numerous cellular tests have been performed to optimize the range and values of the most effective magnetic frequencies in tissue repair.
TMR-Therapeutic Magnetic Resonance- BROCHURE-PROFESSIONAL-ENG.pdf
MBST ( Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Therapy )
The MBST therapy system does not use magnetic spin technology to generate images, but rather to stimulate different processes in organic tissue at the molecular level.
Years of interdisciplinary research and development work were necessary to be able to use magnetic spin technology therapeutically. Proton densities and relaxation times were determined for different tissues by magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Check more.
Source: https://mbst.de/
PST
Is an extension of PEMF therapy, modified to correspond to the body’s own stimulatory energy parameters and designed to stimulate the growth and repair of connective tissue. It is based on the application of a very specific type and form of signal that is carried on a pulsed electromagnetic field to the affected joint, or area to be treated.
Check more.
Source: http://pst-global.com/
CRT - / TRM-FIT
CRT-Treatments or TRM-FIT are devices working with 2 different frequencies on 3 and more coils integrated in the Applicator-Devices. The Magnetic Resonance activates Cells and Tissues with different Tissue-specific frequencies. The devices are controlled and managed by a cloud solution. So Treatments are downloaded in real-time right at the beginning of the treatments. Besides CRT / TRM-Fit uses an online Scorecard-Solution to determine the Benefit of all Treatments over time regarding Pain and Mobility as criteria. We didn`t find any other Solution, which integrates Treatment- and Reporting-Management in a Cloud.
More about the healthcare devices you can find on http://teinme.it and www.healthin.cloud
Clinical studies:
Each manufacturer delivers many clinical studies which are published in different locations like PUBMED or have a look here: https://electromagnetictherapy.info/studies-and-research/
A common pattern of those studies were:
First there were selected people with a specific pathology. Then the professional ( doctors, physiotherapist…etc.) treated the selected people according to the plan or indications.
Often they used double-blinded study to get a standard quality of this study.
After treatment or the adequate time to get results, they gathered the results and documented them in a study or summary and finally published it.
Non proven facts
Interesting is that some manufacturers and clinics explain the method of “healing” and reactivity, such as ”When you compare this to the fact our therapy stimulates the hydrogen protons”
This is told by doctors or scientists in their presentation, but without proof that hydrogen protons are really stimulated or the reason for the healing.
So we didn’t find any study, or one measurement or any proof that protons are acting with these devices/treatments similar to the MRI regarding hydrogen protons.
There is more to question…
Comparing studies of the different manufacturers, even including the other standard PEMF treatments and devices, you will find out that most studies have challenging results.
On the other hand you don’t find any consideration or study that shows the reason for the benefit or what was the frequency or allocation of the applicator. Also it doesn’t specify the location or frequency of each coil. Obviously there is a lot of ambiguity in the information they make public.
Because there is no specification whether the results might just come from a simple electromagnetic pulse, no matter if you use other frequencies or different numbers of coils or even more Gauss / Tesla…etc.
To find this out, you have to compare the different devices and solutions in a study for each pathology/ indication. Only with this kind of study can the user, the clinic, the professional and the patient get a transparent picture of which solution or treatment will have better outcome regarding his particular problem or health inconvenience.
Software-Solutions to compare different treatment solutions by scorecards exists, like
http://healthin.cloud/ which can accumulate from any clinic or professional even with different devices, all the information and data about the success or failure measured in accumulated Scores considering PAIN and MOBILITY over time.
Any professional makes sense using these technologies to get a clear result and improve his services over time.
Concluding, in health-industry at the end the professional doctors and therapists should have a tool like this for the car industry to compare and choose the right devices, they want to use for their clients and patients:https://www.cars.com/research/compare/